I, like most of my colleagues became a naturopathic doctor because of my own extremely disempowering experiences with the healthcare system.
In my late teens and early 20s I was suffering from what I now know were a series of metabolic and hormonal issues and I, like almost all of my patients and colleagues experienced confusion, gaslighting, frustration and a complete lack of answers for what I was dealing with. I tell my story more in depth in other places, but I was told to “stop eating so much”. I was told everything was normal in bloodwork (or simply not called back). I was weighed incessantly. I was chastised for doing my own research (I had to–no one would tell me anything). I was interrupted, cut off and dismissed.
And so, I did what most of my colleagues do–I got educated. I went to school. First for biomedical sciences and then, when that degree left me with more knowledge gaps than answers (and no one who would indulge, let alone answer, my questions), I became a naturopathic doctor.
Throughout my 8 years as a practicing ND, I have encountered thousands of similar stories of disempowerment and confusion and frustration. We patients are trained to see our doctors when we feel depressed, fatigued, or debilitated by PMS, menstrual pain, headaches, and mood issues. Most of us don’t care what answer we get–fine, if it’s a medication I need, I’ll take it! But if we experience lack of benefit from the solutions and a lack of answers, then what? I’ve heard this story over and over.
And so, like many of my colleagues I use the privilege of my education to help me navigate the system. I ice a sore foot for 2 days and then get an x-ray (picking a non-busy time to visit the ER). I take the orthopaedic surgeon’s advice with a grain of salt and implement my own strategies for bone healing. I ask for the bloodwork I need (and know my doctor will agree that I need) and pay for the rest out of pocket. I know my doctor’s training and I understand her point of view and I don’t get frustrated when diet and nutrition or lifestyle are never mentioned. I don’t get upset if my doctor doesn’t have an explanation for symptoms that I now know are related to functioning and not disease, and that it is disease which she is trained to diagnose and prescribe for.
And thankfully, my experience with the healthcare system has been quite limited as I’m able to treat most things I experience at home and practice prevention.
My good friend, who is a naturopath as well, and who has given me permission to share her story, had the same experience up until this summer. She too used the healthcare system quite judiciously and limitedly until a series of stressors and traumas landed her in in-patient psychiatric care (i.e.: a psychiatric hospital) for a psychotic episode–her first.
…And until she started experiencing debilitating gastroesophageal symptoms that were beyond what one might consider “normal.”
And in both cases she sought help from the medical system. She told me recently that her experience was quite different from the ones she’d had in her 20s when her long-standing parasite was misdiagnosed as IBS and she was repeatedly dismissed by doctors. She told me “I’ve been having great experiences with the healthcare system. It’s not like it was before. My doctors have listened to me. They’ve been helpful. Yes, they’ve recommended drugs but when I tell them that I don’t want to take the medications because I know what they do and how they work and don’t think I need them, they respect that. They treat me like I’m a real person. They’re all our age, too. The procedures are more state-of-the-art. The facilities are pleasant. Something has changed in healthcare.”
I know that my friend’s experience might be different from yours. I’m not saying her experience is universal. In fact, if I reflect on my interactions with the fracture clinic in St. Joe’s hospital in Toronto, I had a fairly good experience as well (except for long wait times and booking errors). Sometimes medical trauma can blind us to reality–sometimes we aren’t willing to re-evaluate our assumptions until someone points out a piece of reality that is hard to deny. I actually haven’t had a direct negative experience with healthcare in years– and yet I had chalked that up to the fact I rarely need to use it.
But my friend had had two quite intense experiences and came away from them feeling positive about the care she received. I wondered what was different. Here are my thoughts.
Medical care has evolved. It is inevitable that this happens. Sometimes we might have just had a bad doctor, or someone who was having a bad day or maybe was triggered by our experience. I sometimes think not knowing how to help triggers doctors—I think this might have been the case with the doc who told me to eat less. She might have felt helpless and incompetent at not being able to help me and projected those feelings onto me as a “difficult patient”.
Ultimately health professionals got into their field to “help people”. If you’re not helping people you might feel triggered. But then, if you’re a competent professional, and I believe most are, you look for new ways to help. You open your mind to other practitioners, like NDs. You might not understand why or how what they do works, but “whatever works.”
Doctors are increasingly open to new studies on nutrition. They recognize treatment gaps in their care and in medical knowledge and guidelines. Nutrition and alternative practices are entering mainstream and are dismissed as “woo woo” less and less, particularly by doctors who embrace science and research.
With the evolving landscape of medical care, doctors and health professionals are adapting to new perspectives and approaches to help their patients effectively. Acknowledging that some past encounters might have been influenced by various factors, professionals are increasingly open to alternative practices and unconventional methods. They are embracing the significance of research and scientific advancements, often exploring innovative solutions such as the MAS Test to bridge treatment gaps and enhance patient care. By incorporating cutting-edge tools like the MAS Test, doctors are demonstrating a commitment to understanding diverse approaches, ensuring they provide comprehensive and personalized healthcare solutions to their patients. This openness to holistic methods and ongoing research not only enriches medical knowledge but also fosters a more inclusive and effective healthcare system for everyone.
I always say, when picking a doctor pick one that listens, that is curious and that is humble. I strive to be these things, although it’s not easy. Practicing medicine is as much an art as it is a science–we need to be able to not only admit but carry with us the absolute truth that we do not know everything. It is literally impossible to know everything. The body and nature will constantly present us with mysteries on a daily basis, but the gift of being a clinician is that we are constantly learning.
“I don’t know, but I will try to find out” should be every doctor’s mantra (along with Do No Harm).
In a busy and overloaded system we need to help healthcare workers help us. This means being informed. My friend is highly informed and educated in healthcare. I believe her healthcare providers could sense this. She was respectful in denying medications and wasn’t pushed (because she had informed reasons that the healthcare practitioners ultimately agreed with, “no, you shouldn’t go on a PPI long-term, that’s right” “yes, anti-psychotics do have a lot of side effects, and taking them is a personal choice”).
A significant element of my medical trauma was the feeling of disempowerment. I was completely in someone else’s hands and they were not communicating with or educating me. I was left feeling lost and hopeless. Empowerment is everything. It allows you to communicate and make decisions and weigh options. You know what healthcare can offer you and what it can’t.
Of course we can’t always be empowered, especially when we’re very sick and when we’re suffering. In this case, having advocates in your corner are essential. Perhaps it’s having an ND who can help you navigate the system, think clearly and help you weigh your options.
I also recognize that it is hard to be empowered in emergencies. Fortunately, modern medicine handles emergencies exceptionally well. Still, in this case, having an advocate: friend, practitioner or family member, is an incredible asset.
Physicians are burned out. Patients are burned out. I believe this is because of responsibility. Neither the medical system nor the individual can possibly be solely responsible for your health. I believe that responsibility is better when shared. We need help. We can’t do things alone: we need someone’s 8+ years of education, diagnostic testing, clinical experience and compassion. We also need our own sense of empowerment so that doctor’s don’t succumb to the immense pressure of having to fix everyone and everything.
My sister in law is an ER nurse and once remarked (when asked if the ER was busy and chaotic) “people need to learn self-care”. She didn’t mean self-care as in bubble baths. She meant: learning how to manage a fever at home, when a cut needs stitches or how to determine if a sore ankle is a sprain, strain or break. A lot of people were coming in with colds—self-limiting, non-serious infections that could easily be treated at home. This was burning her out. Of course, she meant, go to the ER if you’re not sure. But, there are many non-grey areas in which we can feel empowered to manage self-limiting, non-serious health conditions as long as we know how to identify them or who to go to for answers.
Education is power. In a past life (before becoming an ND and while studying to become one) I was a teacher. I am still a teacher and in fact the Latin root of the word doctor, docere, means “to teach.” Healthcare is teaching. No doctor should say “just take this and call me in the morning” and no patient should accept this as an answer. We have the right to ask, “what will this pill do? When can I stop taking it? How does it work?” This is called Informed consent: the right to know the risks and benefits of every single treatment you’re taking and the right to respectfully refuse any treatment on any grounds.
You have the right to a second opinion. You have the right to say, “Can I think about this? I’d like to read more about it.” You have every right. You have the right to bring a hard question to your doctor, like “do I really need this statin? A study in Nature found that the optimal cholesterol level for reduced all-cause mortality is around 5.2 mmol/L, which is much higher than mine. Do I really need to be on something that lowers my cholesterol?”
If we can’t speak to our doctors, we turn to Google. Being a good researcher is a skill. This is what I was trained to do at naturopathic medical school and in undergrad. How can you tell if a study is a good study? Does the conclusion match the results? What does this piece of research mean for me and my body? Your doctor should be able to look at you and answer your questions to your satisfaction. This is basic respect.
You deserve to access the results of your blood tests and be walked through the results, even if everything is “normal”. Even a normal test result tells a story. We deserve transparency.
I was once told in a business training for healthcare practitioners (NDs, actually) that “people don’t want all the information. They don’t want to know how something works. They just want you to tell them what to do.”
Now, I sincerely disagree with this. In my experience, patients listen vividly when I walk them through bloodwork, explain what I think is happening to them and try to describe my thought process for the recommendations I’m making. I’m sure a lot of what I say is overwhelming–and then I try to put it differently, and open the conversation up to questions to ensure I’m being understood. Again, doctor as teacher, is a mantra we should all live by. There are few things more interesting than learning how our bodies work. In my experience, patients want to know!
When our bodies occur as a mystery, we are bound to live in fear. We are bound to feel coerced and pressured into taking things that our intuition is telling us to wait on, or seek a second opinion for. When we are scared to ask our doctors questions or take up their time, we end up having to deal with our concerns on our own. When we are dismissed we end up confused and doubting ourselves. We end up disconnected from our bodies. We are anxious. We catastrophise. We give away our power to strangers.
Empowerment is everything. It helps us connect to our bodies. It strengthens our intuition. We know where to go or who to go to for answers (or at least a second or third, opinion). We can move ahead with decisions. (i.e.: “I’m going to take this for 8 weeks and if I don’t like the side effects, I will tell my doctor that I want to wean off or ask for another solution”). We are aware of the effects and side effects of medications. We are aware of our options. We know if something isn’t right for us. We can make food and life style choices in an informed and empowered way. We can feel in our bodies who is trustworthy. We can trust ourselves and our bodies.
When patients are empowered, I believe doctors experience less burnout. The responsibility is shared evenly among patients, friends, family and a circle of care of helpers. No one faces the entirety of the weight of their health alone. No one should.
Empowerment and health don’t mean that you’ll be completely free of disease, or that your body will never get sick, or that you will be pain and suffering free. We all get sick. However, empowerment can help you notice something is off. Increased awareness helps you advocate for yourself to get the care you need in a timely fashion. It helps you take necessary steps, even if you’re afraid. You might be less afraid when you have more information. You might have more hope when you know all your options.
Empowerment in healthcare is everything. And here’s the thing: your doctor wants you to be empowered. Empowered patients are fun to work with. They ask good questions. They are respectful. They are open. They give us practitioners an opportunity to learn. My friend experienced this. I’m sure she was a joy of a patient to work with because she was knowledgeable, alert and present. She maintained her own power. She asked questions when she was unsure. She knew what questions to ask. She knew where to go for answers on her own time. She knew which information was relevant for her practitioners to know. She knew how to ask for time and space before making a decision. She knew how to maintain her sense of autonomy. Most of all, empowerment gives us the strength to find a new practitioner if the therapeutic relationship we’re in isn’t respectful or supportive.
I believe we get into the helping professions to help–to heal, to learn and to alleviate suffering. We all swore an oath to “do no harm”.
What do you think? How has health empowerment helped you navigate your own healthcare?
It’s mulberry season, which means while walking through my neighbourhood I can snack, picking food right off the trees growing behind fences or on people’s front lawns whenever I walk by a berry-stained sidewalk.
There’s something therapeutic about entering into the flow state of berry-eating from a tree (or a bush? they’re massive bushes. The act of eating becomes a ritual. It demands presence and attention. It becomes like a game, the objective is looking for rich colour, ripeness, size, and strategizing how to access the delicious, prized morsel you’ve laid your eyes on, then savouring the experience of having attained it, before beginning the process again.
It’s impossible to binge-eat this way.
I remember at my friend’s cottage last Septemeber it was blueberry season and we spent the weekend casually hanging out in the middle of blueberry patches. I would find an abundant bush, settle down in the midst of it and graze. I must have eaten 5 cups of blueberries each day and yet it took me the entire day to do it.
What better way to spend a day?
The best part of it was: I met my food.
I was listening to Paul Saladino of the Fundamental Health Podcast interview Daniel Vitalis from the Rewilding Podcast. The subject came up about foraging, and hunting and meeting your food.
“Some people have never seen a bass,” Daniel Vitalis commented.
“Maybe not in the wild, maybe not in a zoo. They don’t know how big it is, what colour it is, what kind of lakes it lives in, what it looks like.
“And, more importantly, even if someone fishes for bass or knows what they look like, if they eat bass in a restaurant or from a frozen filet they’ve bought at the grocery store, they most likely haven’t met that bass.
“There’s a massive disconnect in our society between us and the food we eat.”
In almost every other culture we would have shared an intimate relationship with food.
When I was eating blueberries I took the time to settle down in a patch of bushes and linger. The act of eating was immersed in a ritualistic past-time. I was connecting with the specific plant whose food I was borrowing. I was visiting her home–her environment.
When you fish for bass, or hunt a deer, you enter that animal’s setting. You meet it alive. You witness it living. You witness it dying.
The animal’s fate intertwines with yours.
Your survival and his become like a seesaw. Yesterday it was your turn. Today it’s mine.
I suppose the fish filet’s fate is also intertwined with yours: he may have been destined to end up in the freezer section of the local Costco, but somehow… it seems radically different, largely impersonal. Colder.
This is why we obsess over food sometimes: where was the bass made? Was it caught or farmed? Is it organic? Where was it processed? Eating animals is wrong—I’m going to go vegan. And so on.
I believe that this neurosis becomes our remedy for disconnect, for the disembodiment we experience. Eating becomes an intellectual task. We need to read labels, visit websites, and do research, rather than just experiencing our food first in its living form, before engaging in the eating of it.
Hunter gatherers don’t read labels. They don’t diet.
The Hadza from Tanzania don’t have food rules, restrictions ,or even mental, nutritional concepts about food. That’s a Western thing.
The Hadza, like many other cultures more connected to their food sources, simply possess the raw biological desire to eat whatever and however much they like that they can get, whenever they can get it. They are guided by taste and hunger.
Their lives revolve around hunting and gathering food. They simply immerse themselves in their food environments and eat.
We are also immersed in a food environment: the packaged, fried, doctored foodstuffs packed into grocery stores, fast food restaurants, gas stations, and convenience stores. These foods connect with our hunger cues and communicate with our tastebuds but offer none of the impact of “real” food on our physiology. They don’t nourish us.
They don’t connect us to the natural world. They don’t encourage ritualistic eating. What happened to that wheat sheaf or corn blade for it to become refined flour or hydrogenated oil? Could I participate in the making of it? Or do I lack the chemicals and technology to process this food to make these potato chips, bread, or cookies?
Our food environment encourages our disconnect and this encourages our neurosis around food and nutrition. In order to thrive in this environment we need to think about food. We need to read labels and make choices and abstain from certain foods, and make an effort to change our environment so that it becomes one more conducive to human nourishment.
We need to refuse foods served to us at events, or buy separate groceries, and make separate meals for our partners or children.
We create a food “island” for ourselves, in the midst of our community.
And this becomes impossible.
You are only as healthy as the group and environment you find yourself in.
So what can we do? Perhaps we can start with community. Where do the healthy people shop? Where do you feel most connected to your food? Is it in your garden? Is it visiting a farm? Hunting or buying meat from a hunter, or a farm? Can you meet your meat before you buy it? Can you develop a relationship with those who grow or process your food?
Perhaps it means more at-home food preparation. Visiting more farmer’s markets. Talking with the people selling you your eggs. Perhaps it means developing a connection with a local farm where you source your food. Perhaps it means you pick your apples in season, or you grow your own herbs. Maybe you bake bread with your children, or can your own tomatoes.
Maybe you develop your own food and eating rituals and you practice them as a family or as a community.
Maybe you ask some questions about your food–what does this bass look like? How did this cow live?
Food has always been so central to human culture.
When we connect with the rituals of picking, hunting, growing, processing, and consuming our food, we learn what it is to be truly human.
I talk about contrast showers for boosting immunity, lowering inflammation, mood, pain and weight loss.
Hello everyone, my name is Dr. Talia Marcheggiani, I’m a naturopathic doctor and today I’m going to talk about hot and cold contrast showers. As naturopathic doctors, one of our modalities is hydrotherapy. Hydrotherapy comes from naturopathic medicine’s roots, using hot and cold water to make changes to circulation, hormonal functioning and immune functioning. I’m going to talk about some of the science behind hot and cold contrast showers.
This is something I recommend to my patients to increase their immune activation, decrease autoimmunity, improve mood and hormonal functioning, as well as increase circulation and there’s some evidence that it might help with weight loss as well.
So, firstly, things like exercise and hot and cold therapies induce a little bit of stress. There’s two kinds of stress: distress, which is sort of that chronic, cortisol-fuelled stress that a lot of people come in with, in a state of burnout that’s causing things like inflammation, and mental-emotional illness, and autoimmune issues, and dysbiosis, and then there’s something called eustress, which is more like exercise, cold therapy: short, small bursts of stress that actually up-regulate proteins and genes in our body to combat stress. These genes are involved in DNA repair, increase antioxidant synthesis, and the antioxidants that our body makes are far more powerful than the ones that you’re going to get from food or supplements.
So, by upregulating these genes, we can protect ourselves from cancer, neurodegenerative disease, and other chronic diseases. It’s really powerful stuff, this is called a “Hormetic” response, hormesis, where small stressors mount bigger responses by the body than is needed to deal with those stressors and overall we’re better off; there’s this net beneficial effect. This is one of the proposed mechanisms for some of the antioxidants or flavonoids in green leafy vegetables. It’s not that they provide us with antioxidants, it’s that they encourage our body to make antioxidants due to the small, toxic load that they present to us. And so there’s some evidence that getting short bursts, or longer bursts of cold, very cold, will increase a hormone called norepinephrine. Norepinephrine is involved in depression and mood. Norepinephrine is a catecholamine and it increases the sympathetic nervous system, which is that fight or flight nervous system. When boosted in small amounts, it can actually elevate mood and so a lot of anti-depressant medications also induce, or inhibit the reuptake of norepinephrine. So these are called SNRIs and they include things like Venlafaxine and Cymbalta. So there’s some evidence that norepinephrine increases 2-3 times after only 20 seconds of immersion in cold water. There’s a connection between norepinephrine lowering pain and inflammation and increasing metabolism and there’s some anecdotal evidence and one study, at least, was done to show that cold immersion therapy actually decreased symptoms of depression.
There’s also these things called hot and cold shock proteins, heat shock proteins and cold shock proteins. So, for example, one is called RBM3, which is a cold shock protein, and these proteins can actually help increase longevity and they can actually help decrease incidences of neurodegenerative diseases and neurodegeneration, so something like Alzeimer’s disease or Parkinson’s disease, which can help us with health longevity, so staying healthier into our later years.
We know that inflammation is one of the drivers of the aging process. Probably the primary driver of the aging process, and one of the main factors in chronic, debilitating disease, and, especially in my focus, mental health, there’s more and more researching coming out that inflammation, low levels of inflammation in the brain, is the main cause of mental health conditions, such as depression, and anxiety, bipolar disorder, OCD, ADHD. There’s these low levels of inflammation that contribute to the symptoms of low mood and by increasing norepinephrine, through small bursts of cold and increasing those cold shock proteins, we’re actually able to combat these mental health conditions. Norepinephrine decreases inflammation by decreasing a cytokine called TNF-a that is known to increase inflammation in the body and in the brain. TNF-a can cross the blood brain barrier and it can inhibit serotonin synthesis and it can actually also increase neuro-inflammation, causing symptoms of mental health disorders.
There’s some studies that cryotherapy, for rheumatoid arthritis actually decreased pain significantly. And there’s also some studies that being in cold water, that cold shock, can actually increase the immune system activation. It’s good to increase our immune system activation if our immune cells are behaving properly. If our immune cells are attacking ourselves, then we want to decrease the immune response. But having higher levels of lymphocytes, especially cytotoxic T lympthocytes that are involved in killing cancer cells, is a very positive thing and that’s been shown to increase in people that underwent cryotherapy, or really acute, short exposure to intense cold.
There’s also an ability to lose weight when exposed to cold, over the long term. There’s a man called Ray Cronise who lost over 80 lbs by just habitually exposing himself to mildly cold temperatures. And one of the mechanisms for this weight loss is through non-shivering thermogenesis, in which the cells in the mitochondria uncouple proteins that make energy and they dedicate all the stored energy in fat to making heat. Kind of like cutting your bike chain. So instead of biking, you’re not moving forward, but you’re generating energy and you’re generating heat. And so our body will do this when it’s slightly cold that it can increase heat. Our body is always striving to maintain constant temperature, between 1 or 2 degrees. This process is regulated by norepinephrine, which rises acutely as soon as we’re exposed to just a few seconds of cold. This can be 40-50 degree water. And then I already mentioned that short, cold exposure can increase the production of antioxidants. Our mitochondria are constantly creating reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species. This is just a product of normal cell metabolism. These become toxic, though and damage DNA if our body doesn’t also produce anti-oxidants to clear out those reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species. The cold induces a little bit of a stress that increases our metabolism that increases the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in our mitochondria and therefore our body is incited to up-regulate the enzymes that create those powerful anti-oxidants that I talked about that are far more powerful than the ones that you can get from food: vegetables, fruits, vitamin C supplement. A couple of these enzymes are glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase, which are very powerful to our cells.
There’s some evidence that hot and cold therapy can increase muscle mass, can increase muscular strength and aerobic endurance. So this is great for athletes post-workout to lower inflammation and improve muscle regensis. And then, it can also increase something called mitochondrial biogenesis, which is the production, or the replication of more mitochondria in the tissues, especially the muscle tissue. So our body will increase the mitochondria content, the mitochondrial mass, in muscle tissue under certain conditions. These conditions are mainly fasting, exercise, and hot and cold shock.
So, what I’ll recommend to my patients, somebody who’s suffering from low immunity, so they’re getting frequent colds and flus, or maybe autoimmunity, or maybe just general inflammation and pain, brain fog sluggishness adrenal fatigue, that kind of sluggish lethargy from depression. So it’s more the sluggish depression, I’ll recommend hot and cold showers.
So what you do is, in your shower, either during your shower, during your regular cleaning routine, or after your shower is done, and you’ve already washed your hair and everything, you’re going to turn the water on to a reasonably hot temperature, so not so hot that it’s scalding, and you’re going to leave that hot water on for 30 seconds to 1 minute. When that’s done, you’re going to turn the shower to as cold as you can tolerate. So with my patients I often coach them to start with a lukewarm temperature before going whole hog and doing cold. And this is just to coax the body into that stress response that we want, that short, quick stress response that’s going to do all those good things: up-regulate anti-oxidant production, increase norepinephrine, decrease inflammation, increase mitochondria synthesis, burn fat. So you’re going to try and make it as cold as possible, for 20 to 30 seconds, and then you’re going to cycle back and forth at least 5 to 10 times, always end on cold, and then, when you’re done, towel off and keep warm.
There’s some evidence that doing this before bed can actually increase REM sleep and help you sleep more soundly without waking up in the middle of the night. We all know that a good sound sleep is going to set the tone for the next day and your energy for the next day. And then there’s also some evidence that doing this in the morning can increase your energy and alertness throughout the day, so it’s almost like this same practice at different times of day impacts our circadian rhythms differently and can give us more of what we want: either more profound sleep or more daytime energy.
So, that was hot and cold showers, my name is Dr. Talia Marcheggiani and you can check out my website at taliand.com or contact me at connect@taliand.com . A lot of this research came from Dr. Rhonda Patrick at foundmyfitness.com .
The Therapeutic Order is a tool that helps guide naturopathic treatment approaches. I explain how naturopathic doctors’ healing philosophy might differ from the conventional medical model.
Hi, guys, I’m Dr. Talia Marcheggiani and I’m recording to you guys from my clinic in Bloor West Village and today I’m going to talk about some myths about naturopathic medicine, especially regarding our relationship with conventional medicine and medications and, in order to talk to you about that, I want to talk to you about something called the Therapeutic Order. So the therapeutic order is from our traditional roots in the formation of the profession of naturopathic medicine. This is one of our philosophical ideas about how to treat somebody that comes in our door and how people should be treated in terms of the medicine that we practice. And this is a 7-step process, or a hierarchy, of what our treatment goals are for seeing somebody. And the reason that I’m relating the Therapeutic Order to medications is because one of the steps in this hierarchy of the Therapeutic Order is pharmaceutical medication. And so I feel that, in naturopathic medicine, most of us, and certainly in our philosophy, in regards to medication, it’s not that we don’t agree with medication or surgery or conventional treatments, it’s our agreement about when they’re implemented and it’s also about our efforts to treat patients before the need for surgery or medications arises. And so, the Therapeutic Order is a system of interventions and we go from lower-force interventions to higher force interventions and the first step in the Therapeutic Order is to remove obstacles to health.
So, anytime someone walks into my office, and is displaying certain symptoms, I’m always looking for, what are the obstacles that their body is facing when it’s trying to achieve its optimal state of health and wellness. Our bodies have evolved over 300 billion years, from whatever our common ancestor was, that first created life, we’re this result of a lineage of survivors, if we’re here on the planet today. And so our bodies have evolved amazing mechanisms to preserve our health and well-being to ensure that our genes are carried on to future generations. So when somebody is coming in in the initial stages of disease, and so this may manifest for you as just this subclinical feeling of “imbalance”, for lack of a better word, there’s often an obstacle in the way. And a big obstacle that often presents itself in my patients’ lives is stress. That’s one that’s huge and that’s the reason that I talk about it so often. Another is toxic burden from our environment. Things like pesticides, plastics, smog pollutants in our air, in our water, in our food, that can also cause an obstacle to health or just give our bodies some extra things it has to deal with that divert it from its job of making us feel and look our best. And another thing, of course, is diet that’s inadequate, that’s not providing us the nutrients that we need or a diet that’s providing us with anti-nutrients, so it’s preventing us from absorbing the vitamins, the minerals and the macronutrients that we need to function optimally.
And some naturopathic doctors will focus on the energetic aspect, the spiritual aspect. So, is the person in front of them pursuing a meaningful life, do they feel satisfied with their work, are they satisfied with their relationships. So, anytime one of these major pillars of our health is lacking that can also present an obstacle to us feeling our best. And oftentimes the obstacle is a mental-emotional one, even if the symptoms that are manifesting are physical.
So, another video that explains this is my wheel of balance video in talking about stress and when I work with mental health, a stage to mental health promotion is emotional wellness, which is why I use that term so often, rather than focusing on eradicating or eliminating or managing symptoms of mental “illness”—and I prefer to say mental health conditions, rather than mental illness—how can we improve our emotional wellness, how can we improve our mental wellness, as opposed to focusing on disease.
Most naturopathic doctors will focus on this level, this will be inherent in our philosophy we’re always going to be looking for what the obstacles are that are in the way of our patients’ achieving symptom-free lives or a life of low or no symptoms, and a life of abundant wellness and energy, and healthy weight management and healthy mood and all of the things that indicate robust health. This will always be inherent in our philosophy.
The second step in the Therapeutic Order is to stimulate the Vis, so this is the “vis medicatrix naturae”, which is Latin for the healing power of nature, which may seem a little bit woo woo to some people, but you can think of the Vis as metabolism or homeostasis, and this is the idea that our body is primed for optimal health, and our body is always striving to maintain balance. And there’s this idea in naturopathic philosophy that sometimes this inherent energetic mechanism that causes life and all living beings, that sometimes it needs to be stimulated and oftentimes the therapies to do this are more in the energetic realm. So things like homeopathy and acupuncture and hydrotherapy as well, so using water and various temperatures to increase metabolism, hormonal balance, homeostatic balance and blood flow, so those are all scientific terms for what I think the Vis attempts to describe.
So, I tend also to use diet in this realm and herbs. I believe that herbs, and there’s some research for this, some evidence that herbs are modulating, that herbs, as opposed to drugs, kind of seek where things are lacking and they balance our hormonal milieu, our hormonal landscape, more than a medication, which is man-made and an example of this is that some people supplementing with straight vitamin A experienced some negative outcomes in large studies that were done. But if you eat foods that are high in vitamin A, those negative symptoms from vitamin A supplementation seem to balance themselves out and that’s because there are some nutrients present in vitamin and nutrient-rich foods that we haven’t discovered yet and that seem to act synergistically with other chemicals, natural chemicals, that are present in those foods. And so, by taking nature into our bodies through forest bathing, so physically being in nature, or through the consumption of plants and natural substances, I believe that we receive some of those messages from nature. And I can get into this in future videos. I find that herbs have intelligence behind them. And that’s not necessarily woo-woo or pseudoscientific, there’s some research for sure that show that herbs modulate through their anti-inflammatory effects, their anti-oxidant effects, and their hormone-balancing effects, in ways that pharmaceuticals don’t do to the same extent.
So, these two stages, when patients are coming in and we’re focusing our treatment, we’re removing obstacles and stimulating the body’s capacity to heal and you can think about this. If you break a bone, we’re definitely going to remove the obstacle, which is whatever broke the bone in the first place, and then we’re going to promote the body’s ability to heal. It’s not conventional medicine that heals the bone, we simply align the bone so that it can fuse together. It’s the body that heals it. So, we’d be promoting the healing of that tissue with some of the nutrients that the body needs. So this can be applied no matter how serious the medical condition, but definitely it will always be implicit in our treatment plans and how we look at the body. And sometimes that’s enough, if somebody is just coming in with a general feeling of imbalance or, you know, someone who’s coming in with a good state of health, without a loss of apparent symptoms that just wants to manage their health in general, then we’ll kind of stop there, but we might teach you some ways to detoxify, to encourage a healthy diet, and the healthy consumption of health-promoting foods and we’ll let you sort of maintain that on your own.
But what often happens is that people are coming in, because we’ve been taught in our culture in North America and Canada, especially, to come in and seek medical care when we’re feeling ill, a lot of the time people will come in with some kind of issue, so some specific symptoms, and oftentimes these symptoms are apparent or located within one organ system. And so the third step in the Therapeutic Order is to strengthen weakened systems. So this might be somebody who’s coming in a liver issue and this may be a diagnosed issue, or based on their symptoms, we’re noticing some impairment in the liver in general. And so we take treatment a step further and we start to focus on actually repairing the tissues that are present in the liver and so we’ll be using some, perhaps, liver detoxification, some more intense diets, so diets that are geared more to therapeutics, and using some herbs and nutrients to clean out the liver.
We can also use some of our energetics, at this stage, acupuncture, homeopathy, hydrotherapy, self-care practices, and we’ll definitely be removing obstacles to cure, so high-sugar diets, or overconsumption of alcohol, or a high toxic burden. We’ll be looking at those things as well, but we’re also taking it a step further and specifically focusing on the liver in this case.
And this is something that I see most of in my practice, is people coming in with hormonal imbalance, with a mental health condition, with digestive issues, skin issues, hair falling out, and so we’re ordering labs, we’re targeting specific organ systems, and we’re, maybe not necessarily putting these symptoms into a diagnostic category, that would be diagnosed by a conventional doctor, so sometimes these are still subclinical, but there’s definitely symptoms present, people are suffering and they’re noticing a change and they’re probably have already sought help with their medical doctor and maybe were told everything was fine, or maybe they received a diagnosis.
The 4th stage in the Therapeutic Order is to correct structural integrity. So, if our posture, if our alignment is off, then our health is not going to work properly, there’s not going to be proper nerve conduction, there won’t be proper circulation, there won’t be proper functioning of our organ systems. If our rib cage is collapsed, we won’t be breathing properly and we won’t be oxygenating our tissues. If our pelvis is out of alignment we won’t experience proper digestion and digestive regulation. And I often refer out for this stage, I might refer to an osteopath or a chiropractor, or a physiotherapist or massage therapist. I might so some acupuncture myself, but typically for structural correction, I’ll refer to another practitioner and I myself see a massage therapist, chiropractor, osteopath and do quite a bit of hydrotherapy and work on aligning my body through yoga and things like that because of its importance and just general health maintenance.
While this is the 4th stage in the Therapeutic Order, I often recommend that it be implemented as some kind of healthcare strategy that focuses on structural integrity be implemented early on or as a maintenance, especially because we’re so sedentary and we spend so much time in front of our computers and often engage in repetitive exercise. Working on structural integrity management is so important.
The 5th stage in the Therapeutic Order is the use of natural substances to restore and regenerate. And so this is a little bit like symptom management, if you can imagine that. The objective of naturopathic medicine is not necessarily to fix a specific disease, which is often confusing, because we have a very disease-focused healthcare system, not necessarily a health-focused one. And so we’re sort of indoctrinated into this view that if you don’t have a diagnosis that you’re healthy, or that health is the absence of symptoms, which is certainly not the philosophy of the world health organization who believes that health is a mixture of our mental and spiritual and emotional and physical wellbeing and not simply the absence of disease, however we do have a sickcare system rather than a healthcare system, and so we’re educated not to go to the emergency room or your family doctor unless you feel like it’s serious enough to warrant a diagnosis and, if it’s not, then you’re often sent home and told everything’s fine. And patients will always come in having told me that their labs are fine. And they are, they’re fine in the framework of not requiring a diagnosis, or pointing to necessary pathology, but they’re certainly not fine in the sense that not things that we can improve on and that are not giving us warning signals of what could come in the future.
We often focus on disease prevention and healing the body rather than focusing on the symptoms or the pathology. We’re looking for the underlying cause. However, sometimes we get far enough along that we do need to manage symptoms, otherwise people aren’t going to notice benefit. And, so, further along the disease process, further along the naturopathic order we need to reach. To manage the diseases. These are a little bit higher-force interventions, rather than sort of encouraging tissue repair, like we were doing in the 3rd stage of the Therapeutic Order, now we’re focusing more on managing symptoms, managing inflammation through herbs that are going to calm it down quickly, and detoxify quickly, and we’re going to manage headaches with herbs, that are just generally anti-inflammatory. So we’re going to be looking at symptom-management. And so a lot of the time we’ll do that in conjunction with the other 4 stages of the Therapeutic Order, but this time there is a heavy focus on keeping symptoms under control for better quality of life and to move the needle further.
And the 6th step of the Therapeutic Order is similar to the 5th, except we’re using pharmacological devices and so it’s not that we’re against pharmacology and medications in naturopathic medicine, at all, we simply want to encourage patients to come and see us before things get to the point where you require medications and I certainly believe and I think even many conventional practitioners agree with me on this, that medications are probably too widely prescribed or over-prescribed. And this may be that there are no other solutions and, as a clinician, you want to help the person sitting in front of you and aren’t really sure how to go about that. So somebody comes in to your office who has depression and you’re going to reach for the selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitor, the SSRI, the Prozac or Cipralex, you’re not going to tend to risk using herbs or focusing on diet or digestion or those kind of things, you’re going to use this “proven method” and you’re going to implement that right away, whereas my philosophy would be to, depending on how serious the case is, to implement other interventions and make sure that our terrain is being treated, that we’ve removed some obstacles to cure, we’ve encouraged spiritual and life-meaning pursuits and we’re stimulating the body’s own healing mechanisms and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, and that maybe we’re directly targeting the brain with some nutrients and some vitamins and that we’re making sure structural integrity is there, and that we’re even using some herbs to manage depression because we know that St. John’s Wort works very similarly to an anti-depressant in terms of its efficacy. And then, if those things are not working or not having enough of an impact, then we might talk about an SSRI, depending on how severe the case is.
And I say this not to create a stigma around medication use at all. Every single body is different and everybody’s going to need a different treatment concoction and it’s never going to be just one treatment or very rarely will it just be one panacea, no matter how much we wish that there were, it’s going to be a few things that we need to implement to help manage our own health, so that’s when we’ll reach for the pharmaceuticals, when the natural treatments are not having enough of an impact, or the disease process has progressed far enough.
And then the last is the use of high-force interventions, so surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. When you’re diagnosed with cancer, then it’s definitely appropriate to do radiation and chemo or to excise the tumour, or if there’s joint degeneration to the extent that it can’t further be repaired, and you can’t sort of prevent it any longer, because you’ve reached the point where the cartilage in your joint is damaged, then a joint replacement is appropriate. It’s not that we’re against these things either, it’s that we believe in trying as hard as we can to prevent them from being necessary. But when appropriate, they’re definitely a gift that we have in our culture and the time that we live in that we can use these kinds of things to improve our quality of life and to get us back on track in terms of our health. And so very rarely will I see somebody who requires this stage of intervention, even naturopaths that work with cancer, their focus is not to treat cancer with natural therapies but to support the whole patient and to improve the outcomes of the high-force interventions, often an obstacle to healing from cancer is that patients aren’t able to finish their course of chemo due to the side effects, and so a lot of the natural therapies can help boost the efficacy of the medication and reduce the side effects and make patients feel better, so that they’re able to complete their treatment and then have better outcomes. So, at these two, the last two stages, where we’re using medications and high-force interventions, natural medicine is working to support the terrain and to support the body, through the therapies, through the side effects and to also encourage the therapies to work better.
And just to recap, the stages of the Therapeutic Order are first, number one, remove the obstacles to health, number two, stimulate the Vis Medicatrix Naturae, or stimulate homeostasis, improve our body’s self-healing mechanisms through applying nutrients, or looking at energetics, or using herbs to balance our systems and promote proper hormone balance. And the third is to strengthen weakened organ systems, focusing on one organ that may be the culprit in causing symptoms in particular, and really using nutrients that target that organ and the tissues that that organ has. Number four is to correct structural integrity, creating proper alignment and healing the musculoskeletal system through things like chiropractic medicine, osteopathy, massage therapy, even hydrotherapy and acupuncture, doing exercise like yoga as well fits under there. And number five is to use natural substances to restore and regenerate, so this is using natural substances to work directly with symptoms, to promote healing, but in patients that are further along the road to pathology and maybe already have a diagnosis of some health condition. And number six is to use pharmaco-substances to halt progressive pathology, so these are palliating, they’re stopping disease, they’re treating somebody who is either not responding enough or whose disease has progressed far enough that natural therapies are no longer strong enough. And then the seventh stage of the Therapeutic Order is to use high-force invasive modalities, such as surgery, radiation and chemotherapy and, again, these are removing the disease. Often that stage is usually life or death situations, we’re working to remove what’s causing a danger to our body and to our ability to survive. And so naturopathic medicine cover this whole spectrum. We have therapies that cover the whole spectrum of these stages and we’re working to treat the whole person not focusing on the disease or the symptoms, but looking at the person in front of us, and taking into account their lifestyle their preferences, their unique individuality and genetic expression and individual expression. My name is Dr. Talia Marcheggiani, I’m a naturopathic doctor and I work at Bloor West Wellness in Bloor West Village in Toronto. Take care.
In this video I give an education talk to a group of seniors at the Bernard Betel Centre about naturopathic medicine. I discuss our philosophy, education, what kinds of conditions we treat and answer some questions along the way.
“I was born with an imbalance in my brain,” my patient explains to me, “The medication corrects it—Since I started taking Cipralex, I wake up feeling like a normal person again.”
It is estimated that about 10% of adults in North America are taking a medication to help them cope with anxiety and depression. Many people swear by these substances, others claim that they worsen depression, cause uncomfortable side effects and fail to treat the root cause of symptoms, numbing us to the experience and cause of our emotional pain and physical symptoms. The reality is, however, that prescriptions for these medications is increasing.
What are anti-depressants?
Most anti-depressant medication falls into the pharmaceutical category of SSRI, or Selective-Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors, like Prozac or Cipralex. These medications prevent the body from mopping up the “happy hormone”, serotonin, in the brain, making its feel-good effects last longer. The result is thought to be more serotonin in the brain and, therefore, increased feelings of happiness and euphoria. Other drugs work on preventing the re-uptake of other neurotransmitters, brain chemicals dopamine and norepinephrine, which also cause feelings of happiness, pleasure and reward, and give us energy.
The Monoamine Theory of Depression:
The leading theory of depression for decades, the Monoamine Theory, states that in people who suffer from depression, there is an imbalance in serotonin production and signalling in the brain—a “serotonin deficiency”—which SSRI medication corrects. Because this is how anti-depressant medication works, this has taken over as the prevailing theory of depression. However, there has never been a published study that proves that people who suffer from depression or anxiety have issues with brain serotonin production or metabolism. It almost seems that pharmaceutical companies have “reasoned backwards” creating a theory in order to support anti-depressant use.
As patients, we want to believe that the medicine our doctors give us is just that, medicine—something that treats the root cause of disease and makes us healthier, rather than covering up our symptoms while the underlying problem continues to worsen. However, most medications don’t work that way. While Advil may alleviate a headache, we intuitively know that our headache was not caused by an Advil deficiency. Likewise, alcohol may calm down those plagued by social anxiety, but we know that alcohol isn’t a cure for social anxiety; it is a drug that can temporarily help symptoms and relying on it will only cause further health problems down the line. We know that for most health conditions, while a drug may help temporarily, something else is going on inside our bodies that warrants attention.
While the percentage of people who are medicated for depression has increased in recent years, the rate of disability from mental health conditions is steadily on the rise. This is perplexing, especially if these drugs are doing what they’re “supposed to”, which is curing a brain chemical imbalance. Shouldn’t medicating patients with depression result in a cure, or at least a declining rate of disability for mental health concerns? Clearly, something else is going on.
Harnessing the Placebo Effect:
Many patients report the fact that anti-depressant medications saved their lives, radically turning around serious and debilitating symptoms. I’ve heard quite a few stories from individuals who couldn’t get out of bed until they found the right SSRI for their body.
The data shows that SSRI medication has the ability to reduce depressive symptoms by 30% in individuals, a modest reduction at best, but still significant. But, do these medications work as well as the studies claim? A glance at the entire body of research casts doubt on the efficacy of anti-depressant medication:
Firstly, there is a large body of unpublished negative studies. This means that studies that show there is no difference in anti-depressant medication and placebo is left out of the body of literature, favouring a bias for positive publications, publications that find anti-depressants work. Medical research draws conclusions by producing studies over and over again. When the results of several studies are combined, doctors and researchers are able to draw conclusions about whether a medication works or not. When only positive research is published, without negative research to balance it out, it casts medications in a favourable light that they may not necessarily deserve. This is an unfortunate phenomenon in medical science as a whole, and often skews the evidence in favour of drugs that may not be as effective as we hope.
Secondly, the gold standard for evidence, the Randomized Control Trial (RCT) may have design flaws due to the nature of the medications being tested. In RCTs, patients are randomized into two groups. One group is given placebo and the other the active drug that is being tested. The subjects and the people evaluating them are both blinded—neither knows which group is given the drug and which is given the placebo. This reduces the possibility of bias in reporting and observing the effects of the medication. The idea is because an inert pill, or “placebo” may be able to exert the effects of a drug, providing about 30% benefit, according to some sources. However, when patients who are in the active group experience side effects of the medication: gastric symptoms, nausea, headaches, altered sleep and appetite, they quickly become alert to the that fact that they are in the medication group, leaving room for the placebo effect to occur. This is termed the “Active Placebo Effect”. When SSRIs are compared with active placebos—placebos that don’t act as medicine but produce the same side effects—we found their effects rapidly diminished, perhaps because the placebo effect was not taking effect anymore.
What about the people who SSRIs help?
To cast doubt on the efficacy of anti-depressants does not in any way invalidate those who have felt the medications helped them. Every body is different and I believe that it is not for us to say how someone should or shouldn’t be reacting to a medication or therapy. The mysteries of our bodies are vast and there is only so much that we’re aware of in the world of medicine and health. Furthermore, the placebo effect, while often being used to dismiss therapies (“oh, it’s probably just a placebo effect”) should really be viewed as an amazing miracle of medicine and evidence of how powerful our bodies and minds are. The placebo effect shows us that, according to our beliefs, we have the power to heal ourselves. We believe that we’re getting treatment, we believe the treatment will help us, and the very nature of those beliefs heals our physical bodies.
This does not mean that the people who were suffering before taking the medication were “faking it” or should have been able to just snap out of it—that’s not how the placebo effect works. The placebo effect is based on changing our beliefs, which, as you may know, is not something we can simply will ourselves to do. However, the fact that our beliefs hold this kind of healing power, I find, frankly, is amazing. The placebo effect shows us evidence of an almost magical ability of the mind-body connection to heal ourselves, without side effects, and I believe it is something that we should harness and celebrate.
What’s the problem, then?
While anti-depressants may be harnessing the placebo effect to help individuals heal, there are downsides to them as well.
Firstly, SSRI medications have a long list of side effects, from weight gain and fatigue to sexual dysfunction and vitamin deficiencies, being on these medications over the long-term can be unpleasant for some and seriously affect quality of life for others.
Secondly, anti-depressant medications are notoriously difficult to get off of. I have assisted many patients in getting off their medication, with the help of their medical team, but it’s never easy and must always be done slowly and responsibly. Getting off medication involves a slow wean over months with support of natural therapies, psychotherapy and lifestyle changes. Because these drugs force the brain to adapt, causing a very real chemical imbalance, oftentimes the withdrawal effects are so intolerable that patients are not able to come off.
Most patients who decide to try anti-depressant medications are not aware how difficult it will be to stop taking the medication, if they should eventually choose to do so. This is unfortunate, as I believe that full informed consent should be applied to patients so that they may make appropriate decisions about their health—patients should be made aware that they are expected to stay on the medication for life and that weaning will be very difficult and, in some cases, not possible.
Finally, there is a growing body of evidence showing that patients who do not receive medication, but other forms of help such as diet and lifestyle changes, psychotherapy and stress management, do better, have higher rates of remission and less relapse than those who are medicated. As we see with the studies that show that more medication is correlated with more disability from mental health concerns, it is possible that medicating depression is only worsening the problem for most people.
So, what causes anxiety and depression?
Scientists and clinicians are not sure what the cause of depression is. However, the Cytokine Theory of Depression and the Gut-Brain Connection are two areas that are gaining increasing interest from researchers. These theories state that depression may be a cause of inflammation in the body that affects the brain, and that imbalances in gut health, especially with gut bacteria may offset mental health, respectively. Naturopathic doctors also notice a clinical correlation between burnout or “adrenal fatigue” and mental health symptoms.
Healing the mind and body, however, starts with creating a therapeutic relationship with a professional that you trust. After that, I find that healing the gut, correcting inflammation and nutrient deficiencies while addressing harmful core beliefs and stress can have wonderful results for healing depression and anxiety.
Depression is a symptom:
Psychiatry would have us believe that depression and anxiety are conditions that we are born with. Conventional medicine states that perhaps we have a familiar tendency to develop these conditions, perhaps we’ve had them since childhood, but, and in this case it is clear, depression and anxiety are not things that you heal from; they are things you simply manage.
I disagree. I don’t believe that depression and anxiety stand on their own as diseases, but symptoms of a deeper imbalance. Like any symptom, I believe mental health concerns are trying to tell us something. Our bodies have no other way of communicating with us other than through the symptoms they produce: lack of motivation, sore muscles, bloating and diarrhea, headache, joint pain, brain fog, fatigue and so on. As naturopathic doctors, we are trained to listen, not just to our patients, but the messages their bodies are signalling to us through symptoms.
This means that, when I start seeing a patient with depression, whether they are on medication or not, we develop a full work-up, asking in-depth questions about sleep, diet, exercise, digestion, mental status, mood, energy, reproductive health and so on. I connect these symptoms together to find out what is going on beyond what may be immediately visible.
Depression and anxiety often have a root cause. The cause may be stress, childhood trauma, leaky gut, adrenal fatigue, inflammation or even medication and drug use itself. Through uncovering the root of the issue, we are able to treat it, helping the body restore itself to balance and health.
My philosophy of healing is that, sometimes, illness can be a gift, especially if it encourages us to delve deep into our lives and values and make the necessary changes for healing ourselves. Sometimes depression and mental health challenges can be the beginning of a grand and fulfilling journey where we learn to connect more deeply to our bodies, discover our life purpose and a greater sense of happiness and life satisfaction.
People seek out naturopathic doctors for expert advice. This immediately positions us as experts in the context of the therapeutic relationship, establishing a power imbalance right from the first encounter. If left unchecked, this power imbalance will result in the knowledge and experience of the practitioner being preferred to the knowledge, experience, skills and values of the people who seek naturopathic care.
The implicit expectation of the therapeutic relationship is that it’s up to the doctor to figure out what is “wrong” with the body patients inhabit and make expert recommendations to correct this wrong-ness. After that, it’s up to the patients to follow the recommendations in order to heal. If there is a failure to follow recommendations, it is the patient who has failed to “comply” with treatment. This “failure” results in breakdown of communication, loss of personal agency on the part of the patient, and frustration for both parties.
When speaking of previous experience with naturopathic medicine, patients often express frustration at unrealistic, expensive and time-consuming treatment plans that don’t honour their values and lifestyles. Oftentimes patients express fear at prescriptions that they had no part in creating, blaming them for adverse reactions, or negative turns in health outcomes. It’s common that, rather than address these issues with the practitioner, patients take for granted that the treatment plan offered is the only one available and, for a variety of reasons, choose to discontinue care.
One of the elements of Narrative Therapy—a style of psychotherapy founded by Australian Michael White—I most resonate with is the idea of the “therapeutic posture”. In narrative therapy, the therapist or practitioner assumes a de-centred, but influential posture in the visit. This can be roughly translated as reducing practitioner expertise to that of a guide or facilitator, while keeping the agency, decision-making, expertise and wisdom of the patient as the dominant source for informing clinical decisions. The de-centred clinician guides the patient through questioning, helping to reframe his or her identity by flushing out his or her ideas and values through open-ended questions. However, the interests of the doctor are set aside in the visit.
From the place of de-centred facilitation, no part of the history is assumed without first asking questions, and outcomes are not pursued without requesting patient input. De-centring eschews advice-giving, praise, judgement and applying a normalizing or pathologizing gaze to the patient’s concerns. De-centring the naturopathic practitioner puts the patient’s experiences above professional training, knowledge or expertise. We are often told in naturopathic medical school that patients are the experts on their own bodies. A de-centred therapeutic gaze acknowledges this and uses it to optimize the clinical encounter.
I personally find that in psychotherapy, the applicability of de-centring posture seems feasible—patients expect that the therapist will simply act as a mirror rather than doling out advice. However, in clinical practice, privileging the skills, knowledge and expertise of the patient over those of the doctor seems trickier—after all, people come for answers. At the end of naturopathic clinical encounters, I always find myself reaching for a prescription pad and quickly laying out out my recommendations.
There is an expected power imbalance in doctor-patient relationships that is taught and enforced by medical training. The physician or medical student, under the direction of his or her supervisor, asks questions and compiles a document of notes—the clinical chart. The patient often has little idea of what is being recorded, whether these notes are in their own words, or even if they are an accurate interpretation of what the patient has intended to convey—The Seinfeld episode where Elaine is deemed a “difficult patient” comes to mind when I think of the impact of medical records on people’s lives. After that we make an assessment and prescription by a process that, in many ways, remains invisible to the patient.
De-centred practice involves acknowledging the power differential between practitioner and patient and bringing it to the forefront of the therapeutic interaction.
The ways that this are done must be applied creatively and conscientiously, wherever a power imbalance can be detected. For me this starts with acknowledging payment—I really appreciate it when my patients openly tell me that they struggle to afford me. There may not be something I can do about this, but if I don’t know the reason for my patient falling off the radar or frequently cancelling when their appointment time draws near, there is certainly nothing I can do to address the issue of cost and finances. Rather than being a problem separate from our relationship, it becomes internal the the naturopathic consultation, which means that solutions can be reached by acts of collaboration, drawing on the strengths, knowledge and experience of both of us.
In a similar vein, addressing the intersection of personal finance and real estate within the therapeutic relationship requires a delicate balance of empathy and practicality. Patients may be navigating the complexities of homeownership or rental expenses, which can significantly impact their overall well-being. Encouraging open communication about these financial stressors fosters an environment where solutions can be explored collaboratively. It’s essential to recognize that financial challenges are not isolated issues but are intricately woven into the fabric of a person’s life, influencing mental and emotional well-being.
For instance, a patient might express concerns about the financial strain associated with homeownership, prompting a discussion about alternative housing options or budgeting strategies. In this context, exploring unconventional opportunities, such as innovative approaches to real estate like eXp Realty, could naturally arise. Integrating discussions about progressive real estate models within the therapeutic dialogue allows for a holistic exploration of solutions, leveraging the expertise and experiences of both the practitioner and the patient. This approach not only addresses immediate concerns but also lays the foundation for a collaborative and conscientious partnership in navigating the multifaceted aspects of personal finance and real estate.
De-centred practice involves practicing non-judgement and removing assumptions about the impact of certain conditions. A patient may smoke, self-harm or engage in addictive behaviours that appear counterproductive to healing. It’s always useful to ask them how they feel about these practices—these behaviours may be hidden life-lines keeping patients afloat, or gateways to stories of very “healthy” behaviours. They may be clues to hidden strengths. By applying a judgemental, correctional gaze to behaviours, we can drive a wedge in the trust and rapport between doctor and patient, and the potential to uncover and draw on these strengths for healing will be lost.
De-centred practice involves avoiding labelling our patients. A patient may not present with “Generalized Anxiety Disorder”, but “nervousness” or “uneasiness”, “a pinball machine in my chest” or, one of my favourites, a “black smog feeling”. It’s important to be mindful about adding a new or different labels and the impact this can have on power and identity. We often describe physiological phenomena in ways that many people haven’t heard before: estrogen dominance, adrenal fatigue, leaky gut syndrome, chronic inflammation. In our professional experience, these labels can provide relief for people who have suffered for years without knowing what’s off. Learning that something pathological is indeed happening in the body, that this thing has a name, isn’t merely a figment of the imagination and, better still, has a treatment (by way of having a name), can provide immense relief. However, others may feel that they are being trapped in a diagnosis. We’re praised for landing a “correct” diagnosis in medical school, as if finding the right word to slap our patients with validates our professional aptitude. However, being aware of the extent to which labels help or hinder our patients capacities for healing is important for establishing trust.
To be safe, it can help to simply ask, “So, you’ve been told you have ‘Social Anxiety’. What do you think of this label? Has it helped to add meaning to your experience? Is there anything else you’d like to call this thing that’s been going on with you?”
Avoiding labelling also includes holding back from using the other labels we may be tempted to apply such as “non-compliant”, “resistant”, “difficult”, or to group patients with the same condition into categories of behaviour and identity.
It is important to attempt to bring transparency to all parts of the therapeutic encounter, such as history-taking, physical exams, labs, charting, assessment and prescribing, whenever possible. I’ve heard of practitioners reading back to people what they have written in the chart, to make sure their recordings are accurate, and letting patients read their charts over to proofread them before they are signed. The significance of a file existing in the world about someone that they have never seen or had input into the creation of can be quite impactful, especially for those who have a rich medical history. One practitioner asks “What’s it like to carry this chart around all your life?” to new patients who present with phonebook-sized medical charts. She may also ask, “Of all the things written in here about you, what would you most like me to know?” This de-emphasizes the importance of expert communication and puts the patient’s history back under their own control.
Enrolling patients in their own treatment plan is essential for compliance and positive clinical outcomes. I believe that the extent to which a treatment plan can match a patient’s values, abilities, lifestyle and personal preferences dictates the success of that plan. Most people have some ideas about healthy living and natural health that they have acquired through self-study, consuming media, trial-and-error on their own bodies or consulting other healthcare professionals. Many people who seek a naturopathic doctor are not doing so for the first time and, in the majority of cases, the naturopathic doctor is not the first professional the patient may have consulted. This is also certainly not the first time that the person has taken steps toward healing—learning about those first few, or many, steps is a great way to begin an empowering and informed conversation about the patients’ healing journey before they met you. If visiting a naturopathic doctor is viewed as one more step of furthering self-care and self-healing, then the possibilities for collaboration become clearer. Many people who see me have been trying their own self-prescriptions for years and now finally “need some support” to help guide further action. Why not mobilize the patient’s past experiences, steps and actions that they’ve already taken to heal themselves? Patients are a wealth of skills, knowledge, values, experiences and beliefs that contribute to their ability to heal. The vast majority have had to call on these skills in the past and have rich histories of using these skills in self-healing that can be drawn upon for treatment success.
De-centring ourselves, at least by a few degrees, from the position of expertise, knowledge and power in the therapeutic relationship, if essential for allowing our patients to heal. A mentor once wrote to me, “Trust is everything. People trust you and then they use that trust to heal themselves.”
By lowering our status as experts, we increase the possibility to build this trust—not just our patients’ trust in our abilities as practitioners, but patients’ trust in their own skills, knowledge and abilities as self-healing entities. I believe that de-centring practitioner power can lead to increased “compliance”, more engagement in the therapeutic treatment, more opportunities for collaboration, communication and transparency. It can decrease the amount of people that discontinue care. I also believe that this takes off the burden of control and power off of ourselves—we aren’t solely responsible for having the answers—decreasing physician burnout. Through de-centring, patients and doctors work together to come up with a solution that suits both, becoming willing partners in creating treatment plans, engaging each other in healing and thereby increasing the trust patients have in their own bodies and those bodies’ abilities to heal.
Today, I’m 30, working on my career as a self-employed health professional and a small business owner and living on my own. I’ve moved through a lot of states, emotions and life experiences this year, which has been appropriate for closing the chapter on my 20’s and moving into a new decade of life. I’ve experienced huge changes in the past year and significant personal growth thanks to the work I’ve been blessed to do and the people who have impacted me throughout the last 30 years. Here are 30 things this past year has taught me.
Take care of your gut and it will take care of you. It will also eliminate the need for painkillers, antidepressants, skincare products, creams, many cosmetic surgeries, shampoo and a myriad of supplements and products.
Trying too hard might not be the recipe for success. In Taoism, the art of wu wei, or separating action from effort might be key in moving forward with your goals and enjoying life; You’re not falling behind in life. Additionally, Facebook, the scale and your wallet are horrible measures to gauge how you’re doing in life. Find other measures.
If you have a chance to, start your own business. Building a business forces you to build independence, autonomy, self-confidence, healthy boundaries, a stronger ego, humility and character, presence, guts and strength, among other things. It asks you to define yourself, write your own life story, rewrite your own success story and create a thorough and authentic understanding of what “success” means to you. Creating your own career allows you to create your own schedule, philosophy for living and, essentially, your own life.
There is such as thing as being ready. You can push people to do what you want, but if they’re not ready, it’s best to send them on their way, wherever their “way” may be. Respecting readiness and lack thereof in others has helped me overcome a lot of psychological hurdles and avoid taking rejection personally. It’s helped me accept the fact that we’re all on our own paths and recognize my limitations as a healer and friend.
Letting go is one of the most important life skills for happiness. So is learning to say no.
The law of F$%3 Yes or No is a great rule to follow, especially if you’re ambivalent about an impending choice. Not a F— Yes? Then, no. Saying no might make you feel guilty, but when the choice is between feeling guilty and feeling resentment, choose guilt every time. Feeling guilty is the first sign that you’re taking care of yourself.
Patience is necessary. Be patient for your patients.
Things may come and things may go, including various stressors and health challenges, but I will probably always need to take B-vitamins, magnesium and fish oil daily.
Quick fixes work temporarily, but whatever was originally broken tends to break again. This goes for diets, exercise regimes, intense meditation practices, etc. Slow and steady may be less glamorous and dramatic, but it’s the only real way to change and the only way to heal.
When in doubt, read. The best teachers and some of the best friends are books. Through books we can access the deepest insights humanity has ever seen.
If the benefits don’t outweigh the sacrifice, you’ll never give up dairy, coffee, wine, sugar and bread for the long term. That’s probably perfectly ok. Let it go.
Patients trust you and then they heal themselves. You learn to trust yourself, and then your patients heal. Developing self-trust is the best continuing education endeavour you can do as a doctor.
Self-care is not selfish. In fact, it is the single most powerful tool you have for transforming the world.
Why would anyone want to anything other than a healer or an artist?
Getting rid of excess things can be far more healing than retail therapy. Tidying up can in fact be magical and life-changing.
It is probably impossible to be truly healthy without some form of mindfulness or meditation in this day and age.
As Virginia Woolf once wrote, every woman needs a Room of Own’s Own. Spending time alone, with yourself, in nature is when true happiness can manifest. Living alone is a wonderful skill most women should have—we tend to outlive the men in our lives, for one thing. And then we’re left with ourselves in the end anyways.
The inner self is like a garden. We can plant the seeds and nurture the soil, but we can’t force the garden to grow any faster. Nurture your garden of self-love, knowledge, intuition, business success, and have faith that you’ll have a beautiful, full garden come spring.
Be cheap when it comes to spending money on everything, except when it comes to food, travel and education. Splurge on those things, if you can.
Your body is amazing. Every day it spends thousands of units of energy on keeping you alive, active and healthy. Treat it well and, please, only say the nicest things to it. It can hear you.
If you’re in a job or life where you’re happy “making time go by quickly”, maybe you should think of making a change. There is only one February 23rd, 2016. Be grateful for time creeping by slowly. When you can, savour the seconds.
Do no harm is a complicated doctrine to truly follow. It helps to start with yourself.
Drink water. Tired? Sore? Poor digestion? Weight gain? Hungry? Feeling empty? Generally feeling off? Start with drinking water.
Do what you love and you’ll never have to work a day in your life. As long as what you love requires no board exams, marketing, emailing, faxing, charting, and paying exorbitant fees. But, since most careers have at least some of those things, it’s still probably still preferable to be doing something you love.
Not sure what to do? Pause, count to 7, breathe. As a good friend and colleague recently wrote to me, “I was doing some deep breathing yesterday and I felt so good.” Amen to that.
As it turns out, joining a group of women to paint, eat chocolate and drink wine every Wednesday for two months can be an effective form of “marketing”. Who knew?
“Everyone you meet is a teacher”, is a great way to look at online dating, friendships and patient experiences. Our relationships are the sharpest mirrors through which we can look at ourselves. Let’s use them and look closely.
Being in a state of curiosity is one of the most healing states to be in. When we look with curiosity, we are unable to feel judgment, anxiety, or obsess about control. Curiosity is the gateway to empathy and connection.
Aiming to be liked by everyone prevents us from feeling truly connected to the people around us. The more we show up as our flawed, messy, sometimes obnoxious selves, the fewer people might like us. However, the ones who stick around happen to love the hot, obnoxious mess they see. As your social circle tightens, it will also strengthen.
If everyone is faking it until they make it, then is everyone who’s “made” it really faking it? These are the things I wonder while I lie awake at night.
Happy Birthday to me and happy February 23rd, 2016 to all of you!
I’ve come to see my migraines as an internal measuring device for wellness, or rather, lack of wellness—kind of like a very painful meat thermometer. From time to time I get bouts of low energy compelling me to spend more time doing low-key activities. However, quick browses through Facebook show me busy colleagues achieving great things and I feel guilty about my relative inaction. A little voice pipes up. “Your body is telling you to rest”, it says. “But if you just started doing things, you’d probably feel more motivation”, voices another, its opponent, the devil on my shoulder. A war ensues and then a headache settles it all. I take it easy for a while, while I’m literally knocked out of commission, in the dark, on the couch with an icepack on my head.
L came to me for fertility, which is another litmus test for good health. When the body is struggling against some sort of imbalance or obstacle to wellness, it will not spend its resources readying eggs, ovulating and ripening uteruses. Our bodies protect us from the metabolic demands of having a pregnancy, which in our current stressed-out, unwell states we probably wouldn’t be able to handle, by simply not getting pregnant in the first place. And so, infertility is a nice entry-way to healing—patients are motivated to examine the effect of their lifestyles on their wellbeing.
The problem was, however, that L barely had time to make and attend her appointments. When she did manage to come in, she was in a rush. She’d often cancel follow-ups because she hadn’t followed through with the previous visit’s plan, even though it had been weeks before. She also reported working 50-hour weeks and staying up early into the morning to work on projects. I wondered, if she couldn’t even make an hour-long appointment with her naturopathic doctor, how would she manage growing and then giving birth to and then raising a brand new human? L simply might have not been ready to heal. Something in me fought to give her my professional assessment; in order to have the baby she wanted, she might have to give up, or significantly let up on, the demands of her job. However, how could I have made such a statement? I held my tongue and tried my best with the modalities at my disposal. We did acupuncture, CoQ10, PQQ and herbal remedies. We worked on sleep and did stress management with adaptogens. In a few months, despite the high demands of her lifestyle, L was pregnant. She still has trouble keeping her appointments with me. L’s body may now be functioning fine, but is it thriving?
Workplace wellness programs teach employees how to survive the 60+ hour workweeks in the office by doing yoga at lunch and eating healthier cafeteria food. They’re taught about stress management and, in the best of cases, given adaptogens and B-vitamins to help their bodies’ sails weather the stress-intensive storms of office life. It’s a great investment, these programs proclaim, because employees are happier, more efficient at their work and take less sick days. Workplace wellness programs keep their employees functional but, I wonder, can anyone really be well working that many hours a week?
When it comes to the health strategies we promote as a profession, how many of them are geared towards healing and how many of them are really just there to help us function?
At this stage in my career, I often have to gauge what my patients want. There are some people who come in ready to heal. They want to search for and address the real root cause of disease, no matter how elusive it may be. They are also willing to do what it takes to get better, even if it means a significant lifestyle shift. Sometimes these patients are at a point where things have gotten so bad that they have no other choice, however some of them simply intuit that the symptoms arising may be conveying a greater message; in order to be truly healthy, things might have to change. Most patients, however, come in looking to “feel better”—they simply want their symptoms to go away so they can get back to their daily lives, lives that might have made them sick in the first place. In our pharmaceutical-based Therapeutics and Prescribing exam, the goal of therapy in the oral cases was always to “restore functioning”, as if our patients were simply pieces of machinery; our parts are worn, maybe broken and we’ve gone decades without a decent oil change, but the factory declares we must get back to work as soon as possible and so we break out the duct tape. With this mindset, however, are we simply placating our bodies long enough to keep working until we eventually succumb to the next thing, a debilitating headache instead of mild fatigue, or something even worse? How long can we go suppressing symptoms or getting our bodies into decent enough shape before we realize that what we really need is some honest-to-goodness authentic healing?
Jiddu Krishnamurti, Hindu philosopher and teacher once said, “It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.” How much of our health marketing and wellness efforts are aimed at cleaning out the cogs in a jammed up machine so that they can go on turning smoothly again? The thought that real healing might mean dismantling the entire machine might be too radical for our society to handle. How can we address the problem of making a living if we acknowledge the fact that our lifestyle, or job, might be making us sick?
A therapist I work with (doctors need healing too!) once told me that mild to moderate depression is a sign that something in your life needs changing. “Look at the symptoms of depression,” She told me one afternoon in her office, “You lose the energy and motivation to keep going with your routine. You stop being social; all of your energy turns inwards. You focus your attention on your self and your life so that you can examine what about it is making you unhappy. Then you change it.” Then you change it, a scary thought. No wonder a tenth of the population opts for anti-depressant medication, which in some cases might be the medical equivalent of dusting oneself off and heading back to work. And, while they seem like more benign options, St. John’s Wort, B12 injections and 5HTP may not be that different.
A friend and I were talking about this very topic. He remarked that at a fitness retail store he worked at he’d often ask his female customers, “What will you be needing these yoga pants for today: form or function?” When I laughed at the shallowness of it all, he protested, “Well, some people are just going to use them to sit in coffee shops while others want to actually work out. What’s going to make your butt look great won’t necessarily be the best choice at the gym. I had to know their motivations.” Are most of our wellness efforts aimed at making our butts look great or are they filling a functional purpose?
I wonder if I should follow my friend’s lead and outright ask my patients, maybe on their intake forms, “Are you looking to truly heal today or do you just want to feel better and get back to work?”—form or function? Being candid with them, might help me decide when to schedule follow-up appointments. At any rate, it would definitely open up a conversation about expectations surrounding decent time-frames for seeing “results” and what true healing might look like for them. The trouble is, restoring functioning, if not easier, is more straight-forward. You make some tweaks to diet, correct some nutritional deficiencies and boost the adrenals or liver. It’s the medical equivalent of filling in potholes with cheap cement—it might not look pretty, but now you can drive on it. Healing, however, is more complex. It’s more convoluted, hard to define and get a firm grasp on. It is also highly individual. It might mean ripping up the entire road, plumbing and all, and building a new one or, even better, planting grass and flowers in the road’s place and nurturing that grass on a daily basis. Healing might be creating something entirely new, something that no one has ever heard of or seen before. Creating is scary. Creativity takes courage, and so does healing.
No matter what it might look like, I believe healing begins with a conversation and a willingness to look inwards, without judgement. Healing also requires an acceptance of what is, even if the individual doesn’t feel ready to take actions to heal just yet. Healing deserves us acknowledging that something is a band-aid solution. Healing definitely demands listening, especially to the body. Therefore, healing might begin in meditation. It might start with a mind-searing migraine that lands you on the couch and the thought, “What if, instead of reaching for the Advil, I just rested a little bit today?” Healing might just start there and it might never end. But, if it does, who knows where it might end up?
A singular narrative is told and retold regarding medicine in the west. The story goes roughly like this: the brightest students are accepted into medical schools where they learn—mainly through memorization—anatomy, physiology, pathology, diagnostics, microbiology, and the other “ologies” to do with the human physique. They then become doctors. These doctors then choose a specialty, often associated with a specific organ system (dermatology) or group of people (pediatrics), who they will concentrate their knowledge on. The majority of the study that these doctors undergo concerns itself with establishing a diagnosis, i.e.: producing a label, for the patient’s condition. Once a diagnosis has been established, selecting a treatment becomes standardized, outlined often in a cookbook-like approach through guidelines that have been established by fellow doctors and pharmaceutical research.
The treatment that conventional doctors prescribe has its own single story line involving substances, “drugs”, that powerfully over-ride the natural physiology of the body. These substances alter the body’s processes to make them “behave” in acceptable ways: is the body sending pain signals? Shut them down. Acid from the stomach creeping into the esophagus? Turn off the acid. The effectiveness of such drugs are tested against identified variables, such as placebo, to establish a cause and effect relationship between the drug and the result it produces in people. Oftentimes the drug doesn’t work and then a new one must be tried. Sometimes several drugs are tried at once. Some people get better. Some do not. When the list is exhausted, or a diagnosis cannot be established, people are chucked from the system. This is often where the story ends. Oftentimes the ending is not a happy one.
On July 1st, naturopathic doctors moved under the Regulated Health Professionals Act in the province of Ontario. We received the right to put “doctor” on our websites and to order labs without a physician signing off on them. However, we lost the right to inject, prescribe vitamin D over 1000 IU and other mainstay therapies we’d been trained in and been practicing safely for years, without submitting to a prescribing exam by the Canadian Pharmacists Association. Naturopathic doctors could not sit at the table with the other regulated health professions in the province until we proved we could reproduce the dominant story of western medicine—this test would ensure we had.
Never mind that this dominant story wasn’t a story about our lives or the medicine we practice—nowhere in the pages of the texts we were to read was the word “heal” mentioned. Nowhere in those pages was there an acknowledgement about the philosophy of our own medicine, a respect towards the body’s own self-healing mechanisms and the role nature has to play in facilitating that healing process. It was irrelevant that the vast majority of this story left out our years of clinical experience. The fact that we already knew a large part of the dominant story, as do the majority of the public, was set aside as well. We were to take a prescribing course and learn how primary care doctors (general practitioners, family doctors and pediatricians), prescribe drugs. We were to read accounts of the “ineffectiveness” of our own therapies in the pages of this narrative. This would heavy-handedly dismiss the experience of the millions of people around the world who turn to alternative medicine every year and experience success.
We were assured that there were no direct biases or conflict of interests (no one was directly being paid by the companies who manufacture these drugs). However, we forget that to have one story is to be inherently and dangerously biased. Whatever the dominant story is, it strongly implies that there is one “truth” that it is known and that it is possessed by the people who tell and retell it. Other stories are silenced. (Author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie describes this phenomenon in her compelling TED Talk, “The Danger of a Single Story”).
Despite the time and money it cost me, taking the prescribing course afforded me an opportunity to step outside of the discouraging, dominant story of the standard medical model and thicken the subordinate stories that permeate the natural and alternative healing modalities. These stories began thousands of years ago, in India and in China, at the very root of medicine itself. They have formed native ancestral traditions and kept entire populations and societies alive and thriving for millennia. Because our stories are not being told as often, or told in the context of “second options” or “last resorts”, when the dominant narratives seem to fail us, the people who tell them run the risk of being marginalized or labeled “pseudoscientific.” These dismissals, however, tell us less about The Truth and more about the rigid simplicity of the singular story of the medical model.
It is frightening to fathom that our body, a product of nature itself, encompasses mysteries that are possibly beyond the realm of our capacity for understanding. It’s horrifying to stand in a place of acknowledgement of our own lack of power against nature, at the inevitability of our own mortality. However, if we refuse to acknowledge these truths, we close ourselves off to entire systems that can teach us to truly heal ourselves, to work with the body’s wisdom and to embrace the forces of nature that surround us. The stories that follow are not capital T truths, however, they can enrich the singular story that we in the west have perpetuated for so long surrounding healing.
The body cannot be separated into systems. Rather than separating depression and diarrhea into psychiatry and gastroenterology, respectively, natural medicine acknowledges the interconnectivity between the body’s systems, none of which exist in a vacuum. When one system is artificially manipulated, others are affected. Likewise, an illness in one system may result in symptoms in another. There have been years of documentation about the gut-brain connection, which the medical model has largely ignored when it comes to treatment. The body’s processes are intricately woven together; tug on one loose thread and the rest either tightens or unravels.
We, as products of nature, may never achieve dominion over it. Pharmaceutical drugs powerfully alter the body’s natural physiology, often overriding it. Since these drugs are largely manmade, isolated from whole plants or synthesized in a lab, they are not compounds found naturally. Despite massive advances in science, there are oceans of what we don’t know. Many of these things fit into the realm of “we don’t know what we don’t know”—we lack the knowledge sufficient to even ask the right questions. Perhaps we are too complex to ever truly understand how we are made. Ian Stewart once wrote, “If our brains were simple enough for us to understand them, then we’d be so simple that we couldn’t.” And yet, accepting this fact, we synthesize chemicals that alter single neurotransmitters, disrupting our brain chemistry, based on our assumption that some people are born in need of “correcting” and we have knowledge of how to go about this corrective process. Such is the arrogance of the medical model.
There are always more than two variables in stories of disease and yet the best studies, the studies that dictate our knowledge, are done with two variables: the drug and its measured outcome. Does acetaminophen decrease pain in patients with arthritis when compared to placebo? A criticism of studies involving natural medicine is that there are too many variables—more than one substance is prescribed, the therapeutic relationship and lifestyle changes exert other effects, a population of patients who value their health are different than those who do not, the clinical experience is more attentive, and so on. With so many things going on, how can we ever know what is producing the effect? However, medicine is limited in effect if we restrict ourselves to the prescription of just one thing. This true in herbalism, where synergy in whole plants offers a greater effect than the sum of their isolated parts. By isolating a single compound from a plant, science shows us that we may miss out on powerful healing effects. Like us, plants have evolved to survive and thrive in nature; their DNA contains wisdom of its own. Stripping the plant down to one chemical is like diluting all of humanity down to a kidney. There is a complexity to nature that we may never understand with our single-minded blinders on.
Studies are conducted over the periods of weeks and, rarely, months, but very rarely are studies done over years or lifetimes. Therefore, we often look for fast results more than signs of healing. This is unfortunate because, just as it takes time to get sick, it takes time to heal. I repeat the previous sentence like a mantra so patients who have been indoctrinated into a medical system that produces rapid results can reset expectations about how soon they will see changes. Sometimes a Band-Aid is an acceptable therapy; few of us can take long, hard looks at our lives and begin an often painful journey in uncovering what hidden thought process or lifestyle choices may be contributing to the symptoms we’re experiencing. However, the option of real healing should be offered to those who are ready and willing.
When we study large masses of people, we forget about individuality. When we start at the grassroots level working with patients on the individual level, we familiarize ourselves with their stories, what healing means to them. In science, large studies are favoured over small ones. However, in studies of thousands of people, singular voices and experiences are drowned out. We lose the eccentric individualities of each person, their genetic variability, their personalities, their preferences and their past experiences. We realize that not everyone fits into a diagnostic category and yet still suffers. We realize that not everyone gets better with the standard treatments and the standard dosages. Starting at the level of the individual enables a clinician to search for methods and treatments and protocols that benefit each patient, rather than fitting individuals into a top-down approach that leaves many people left out of the system to suffer in silence.
It is important to ask the question, “why is this happening?” The root cause of disease, which naturopathic medicine claims to treat is not always evident and sometimes not always treatable. However, the willingness to ask the question and manipulate the circumstances that led to illness in the first place is the first step to true and lasting healing; everything else is merely a band-aid solution, potentially weakening the body’s vitality over time. No drug or medical intervention is a worthy substitute for clean air, fresh abundant water, nutritious food, fulfilling work and social relationships, a connection to a higher purpose, power or philosophy and, of course, good old regular movement. The framework for good health must be established before anything else can hope to have an effect.
The system of naturopathic medicine parallels in many ways the system of conventional pharmaceutical-based medicine. We both value science, we both strive to understand what we can about the body and we value knowledge unpolluted by confusing variables or half-truths. However, there are stark differences in the healing philosophies that can’t be compared. These differences strengthen us and provide patients with choice, rather than threatening the establishment. The time spent with patients, the principles of aiming for healing the root cause and working with individuals, rather than large groups, offer a complement to a system that often leaves people out.
There are as many stories of healing and medicine as there are patients. Anyone who has ever consulted a healthcare practitioner, taken a medicine or soothed a cold with lemon and honey, has experienced some kind of healing and has begun to form a narrative about their experience. Anyone with a body has an experience of illness, healing or having been healed. Those of us who practice medicine have our own experience about what works, what heals and what science and tradition can offer us in the practice of our work. Medicine contains in its vessel millions of stories: stories of doubt, hopelessness, healing, practitioner burnout, cruises paid for my pharmaceutical companies, scientific studies, bias, miracle cures, promise, hope and, most of all, a desire to enrich knowledge and uncover truth. Through collecting these stories and honouring each one of them as little truth droplets in the greater ocean of understanding, we will be able to deepen our appreciation for the mystery of the bodies we inhabit, learn how to thrive within them and understand how to help those who suffer inside of them, preferably not in silence.
